SKU: 9427064866

pots for palm plants

pots for palm plants Buy Mexican Fan Palm Phoenix, AZ | Washingtonia robusta

Name: pots for palm plants Buy Mexican Fan Palm Phoenix, AZ | Washingtonia robusta
Brand: uptowns.fr
SKU: 9427064866
Price: 27.20 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.6291 (310 reviews)

$24.48 $27.20

Save 10%

No.2 Bestseller on uptowns.fr >

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17

Description

pots for palm plants Buy Mexican Fan Palm Phoenix, AZ | Washingtonia robustaThe Toughest Tall Palm for Phoenix Heat Mexican Fan Palm The Mexican Fan Palm (Washingtonia robusta) is the ultimate heat tough, drought tolerant palm for Phoenix and the surrounding Valley. Soaring to 5070 feet at maturity with a slender, graceful trunk and a crown of bold fan shaped fronds, this palm defines the Arizona skyline. Mexican Fan Palms are incredibly low maintenance once established surviving on minimal irrigation, laughing off 115F

The Toughest Tall Palm for Phoenix Heat — Mexican Fan Palm

The Mexican Fan Palm (Washingtonia robusta) is the ultimate heat-tough, drought-tolerant palm for Phoenix and the surrounding Valley. Soaring to 50–70 feet at maturity with a slender, graceful trunk and a crown of bold fan-shaped fronds, this palm defines the Arizona skyline. Mexican Fan Palms are incredibly low-maintenance once established — surviving on minimal irrigation, laughing off 115°F summers, and thriving in the poorest soils. Whether you’re adding dramatic height to a Scottsdale resort-style yard, creating a palm-lined entry in Mesa, or planting a windbreak row in Chandler — the Mexican Fan Palm delivers unmatched vertical impact on the lowest water budget of any landscape palm.

Mexican Fan Palm Plant Details

Attribute	Detail
Scientific Name	Washingtonia robusta
Common Names	Mexican Fan Palm, Mexican Washingtonia, Skyduster Palm
Mature Height	50–70 feet
Mature Width	10–15 feet (canopy spread)
Growth Rate	Fast — 3–5 feet per year in Phoenix
Sun	Full sun (6+ hrs). Thrives in reflected heat from walls and pavement.
Water	Very low once established. Extremely drought-tolerant.
USDA Zones	9–11 (Phoenix is Zone 9b–10a)
Soil	Extremely adaptable. Handles Arizona caliche, sand, clay, and rocky soils.
Foliage	Evergreen — large fan-shaped fronds year-round
Trunk	Slender, smooth reddish-brown trunk with distinctive swollen base

Mexican Fan Palm Uses in Phoenix Landscapes

Dramatic Vertical Accents & Skyline Trees

Nothing adds height and drama to a Phoenix landscape like a mature Mexican Fan Palm. Their slender trunks and elevated canopy create striking silhouettes against Arizona sunsets. Plant as a single focal point in Scottsdale front yards, or group 3–5 at staggered heights for a resort-style statement in Tempe or Paradise Valley properties.

Palm-Lined Driveways & Entryways

Mexican Fan Palms are the classic choice for lining driveways and property entrances throughout the Valley. Space 15–20 feet apart on both sides for a grand allée effect. Their narrow footprint means they won’t crowd walkways or driveways as they mature — perfect for Mesa, Gilbert, and Peoria streetscapes.

Low-Water Windbreaks & Property Borders

Planted in a row at 15-foot intervals, Mexican Fan Palms create an effective windbreak and visual screen at height. They’re ideal for the edges of large Chandler and Surprise properties where you need vertical screening without heavy irrigation costs. Pair with Texas Sage or Ruellia at the base for a layered desert look.

Best Time to Plant Mexican Fan Palm in Phoenix

Fall (October–November) is the ideal planting window. Warm soil accelerates root establishment while cooler air reduces transplant stress. The palm gets 6–8 months of root growth before enduring its first full Phoenix summer. Spring (February–April) is the second-best option. Mexican Fan Palms are tough enough to survive summer planting, but fall gives them the best start.

How to Plant Mexican Fan Palm

Dig wide, not deep — excavate 2–3x the root ball width at the same depth. Don’t plant too deep — the root flare should sit at soil level.
Check for caliche — break through any hardpan layer to ensure drainage. Mexican Fan Palms tolerate poor soil but not standing water.
Backfill with native soil — these palms don’t need amendments. A light 20% organic blend is fine if desired.
Spacing — 15–20 feet apart for grouped plantings; 25+ feet for standalone specimens.
Water basin — build a 3–4 inch soil ring to direct water to the root zone during establishment.
Mulch — 2–3 inches of gravel or bark mulch to retain moisture and suppress weeds.

Watering Mexican Fan Palm in Phoenix

First Year Watering Schedule

Weeks 1–2: Every 1–2 days, deep and slow (20–30 min drip cycle)
Months 1–2: Every 3–4 days
Months 3–6: Every 7–10 days (every 5–7 days in peak summer)
After Year 1: Every 10–14 days in summer; monthly or less in winter

Drip Irrigation

Place 2 emitters (2 GPH each) 18–24 inches from the trunk. Once established (2+ years), Mexican Fan Palms need very little supplemental water — many mature specimens in Phoenix survive on rainfall alone. This is one of the lowest-water palms you can plant.

How fast does Mexican Fan Palm grow in Phoenix?
Mexican Fan Palms are fast growers, adding 3–5 feet per year in Phoenix with regular watering during establishment. A 15-gallon palm can reach 25–30 feet within 5–6 years.

Is Mexican Fan Palm drought tolerant?
Extremely. Once established, Mexican Fan Palms are among the most drought-tolerant palms available. Mature trees often thrive on little to no supplemental irrigation in the Phoenix Valley — a major advantage over Queen Palms and other tropical palms.

What’s the difference between Mexican Fan Palm and California Fan Palm?
Mexican Fan Palms (Washingtonia robusta) are taller and more slender than California Fan Palms (Washingtonia filifera), which are stockier with a thicker trunk. Mexican Fan Palms grow faster and taller — up to 70 feet — while California Fan Palms typically top out at 40–50 feet.

Do Mexican Fan Palms need trimming?
Yes — Mexican Fan Palms should be trimmed annually to remove dead fronds. Without trimming, spent fronds form a dense "skirt" around the trunk. Most Phoenix homeowners schedule a professional palm trim once a year, typically in late spring.

How Many Mexican Fan Palm Do I Need?

Mexican Fan Palm is a tall, fast, slender single-trunk specimen palm placed for vertical drama, not planted in hedge rows. Its narrow 10 to 15 foot canopy lets you line it tighter than most big trees.

Single focal point: one palm makes a skyline statement in a front yard or by a pool. Set the trunk back from the house so the high crown clears the roofline.
Grove or allée: plant odd-numbered groups of 3 to 5 at staggered heights, or a driveway row at 15 to 20 feet on center for a grand allée.
Windbreak or screen row: space at about 15 feet on center for vertical screening on a large property.

Mexican Fan Palm Season-by-Season in Phoenix

Spring (Feb to Apr): fast new frond growth resumes as soil warms. A strong second planting window; late spring is the usual time for the annual frond trim.
Summer (May to Sep): peak growth, putting on several feet and shrugging off 115°F heat and monsoon winds. One of the lowest-water palms once established.
Fall (Oct to Nov): the ideal planting season, giving roots 6 to 8 months before the next summer.
Winter (Dec to Jan): evergreen and cold-hardy to about 20°F. A hard Valley freeze can brown fronds, but the palm pushes fresh growth in spring; no routine cover needed.

At a Glance

✔ Heat-Loving (Reflected-Heat Tolerant) ✔ Drought-Tolerant ✔ Evergreen ✔ Low-Maintenance ✔ Shade-Providing ✔ Cold-Hardy to 20°F

Plant It With

Mediterranean Fan Palm: a compact multi-trunk fan palm to layer lower, denser form below the tall trunks.
Pygmy Date Palm: a petite feather palm for the patio or poolside understory.
Texas Sage: a low-water purple-blooming shrub to soften the base of the palms.
Desert Spoon: a silvery architectural rosette for bold contrast against the slender trunks.

Is Mexican Fan Palm Right for Your Yard?

Mexican Fan Palm is right for you if you want fast, dramatic height on the lowest water budget of any palm, for full sun and reflected heat, almost any well-drained soil, and a yard with vertical room for a 50 to 70 foot tree. It is not a fit for small lots, near pools where frond litter is a concern, or under power lines, since it gets very tall and drops a frond skirt without an annual trim.

Shipping Notes

Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
Delivery to the USA:

Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days

If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell pots for palm plants

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

Best in 7 days

2 Palm Variety Pack / 4" Pots / Live Plant / House Plant

US$ 20.48

Sold : Login>>

Best in 7 days

Nearly Natural 4.5ft. Areca Palm Tree with Black Wash Planter UV Resistant (Indoor/Outdoor)

US$ 28.10

Sold : Login>>

Best in 7 days

Areca Palm in rectangle pot – wellpottedplants

US$ 26.63

Sold : Login>>

Best in 7 days

Garvee 14.2" Tall Planters Set of 2, Self Watering Plant Pots with Water Level Monitor and Built-In Drainage, for Patio, Porch, Living Room, or Home

US$ 21.39

Sold : Login>>

Best in 7 days

Artificial Hawaii Palm Tree | Artificial Tree

US$ 24.11

Sold : Login>>

Sort

Product Reviews

Verified Purchase

Lyndon Unger

Massapequa, US

★★★★★ 4

Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics

Format: Paperback

In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps. Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile. Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312). On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking. Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism. On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors. I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16). I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer. It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009

Verified Purchase

J. E. Lindsey

Fort Morgan, US

★★★★★ 5

Great Contrasts

Format: Paperback

Cowan tells us, "This is a book about apologetics methodology, not a book of apologetics per se. That is, it is not a book that seeks to do apologetics as much as a book that discusses how one ought to do apologetics" (8). Cowan has achieved the stated purposes of this book in many ways, but due to limited space I will stay focused on three examples; Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts, format, and conclusion by Cowan. Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts (21-24) in this initial section of the book provide a clear and useful starting place for persons who are not academically familiar or comfortable with many terms used in the book. The fact that the key terms section included and defined conceptual terms supports the stated purpose of the book being a methodological rather than an apologetic book with multiple views from various writers' specific understandings and preferred styles of apologetics. As a new person to formal apologetics, this section helped launch me smoothly into the methodological discussions. I returned to these pages a few times to reacquaint myself with meaningful concepts. The format of the discussion with proponents making a methodological case for their form of apologetic followed by critiques from supporters of other apologetic systems brought clarity to the five methods addressed in this book. This format help to highlight both strengths and weaknesses in methods. Cowan as the general editor achieved the goal of keeping the writers away from apologetics and on the goal of providing defense and critiques of these five methods. Each supporter had a unique "tee-up" to their sections. Craig starts by stating, "...methodology in Christian apologetics...raising the age-old issue of the relationship between faith and reason." He goes on further in his introduction to tell a story about his struggle at Wheaton College and why his methodology was helpful to his faith (26). Habermas clarifies that his form of evidential apologetics is, "...characterized as the one-step approach..." (92).This initial piece of information was insightful to me and a helpful clarification between classical and evidential methods. Feinberg on Cumulative Apologetics points out, "A good place to begin the discussion of apologetic methodology is to ask about the nature of the case for theism and Christianity" (148). Frame was probably the most direct in his initial statement by saying, "In apologetics, as in every aspect of the Christian life, the most important thing is to glorify God. Therefore, it is important for us to look in God's Word, the Bible, to see if our Lord gives us any directives relevant to the apologetic task" (208). In principle agree, but I will admit, I find his form of apologetics to be too circular in nature to be convincing to an unbelieving skeptic - as a standalone method. Christians I think would all say, well of course. Clark's section begins with stories meant to set the stage that it is reasonable have faith. Clark writes, "My suppose-this and suppose-that stories are intended to raise the problem of the relationship of our important beliefs to evidence" (267). Each of the five supporters of their method successfully introduced their unique method of apologetics. Cowan regarding to his conclusions says, "Hopefully, this will not only help you, the reader, make your own decisions regarding apologetic methodology, but will also provide a basis for further discussion of the topic among scholars. Cowan's conclusions assured that main points of agreement and disagreement were clear. Here as with the other sections, the textual comments were method focused. My criticism is pointed at the spirit of the debate. The writers did not draw enough contrasting between apologetic methods to clearly show that their individual method should be favored. I think the tone was a little too stilted in the direction of "playing" nice. In a book that purports to have five methods, there were times it seemed like only three or four methods. I guess this is inescapable give that each apologetic style can share some parts in common with another. Yet Craig shares my feeling here, I believe, based on his statement, "Pity our poor editor! Ideally he would like to find a wild-eyed fideist on one end of the spectrum and a hard-nosed theological rationalist on the other. Instead he winds up with a presuppositionalist who argues like an evidentialist..." (122). Overall Five Views on Apologetics provides a good compare and contrast resource for anyone interested in these five common methods of apologetics.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2011

Verified Purchase

Mimi

Fort Morgan, US

★★★★★ 5

Condense Analysis of 5 of the most notable Apologist

Format: Paperback

Looking for a quick reference guide to the major theorist of Apologic study, this book is a great resource.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2024

Verified Purchase

Will L.

Omaha, US

★★★★★ 5

Not an Intro to Apologetics

Format: Paperback

This book is not for the first-time student of apologetics. It's deep and, at times, difficult. However, for anyone with a serious interest in apologetics, this is a great way to find out which method suits your apologetic style and why. It was eye-opening for me. I am confident that God can use most (if not all) of the five distinct methods covered in the book. But it was very helpful to me to consider pros and cons of each and decide which approach seemed appropriate for me. Great book, if you feel ready for it!

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2006

Verified Purchase

rkveale

Waukegan, US

★★★★★ 4

Good overview of apologetic methods but ....

Format: Paperback

I very much enjoy the counterpoint series by Zondervan. It can help me quickly come up to speed in a variety of theological topics. This book has 5 contributors and each one presents, each one comments on each other's essay and finally each one has some concluding remarks which allows the reader to readily judge the competing opinions. However after reading the various approaches it appears to me that the apologetical approach one uses is not as important as learning the various theistic arguments (both positive and negative) and then putting them into practice. I'm not convinced that studying apologetic methods will be that helpful. This is because the various approaches overlap and also because when actually talking with people one must be very flexible and move deftly with the flow of conversation. Yet still I give this book 4 stars as there are 5 top Christian thinkers contributing to this subject. On a personal note, one reason I read this book is because I was puzzled by presuppositional apologetics. I stand firmly in the reformed camp and I audited iTunesU courses in apologetics from Reformed Theological Seminary and Westminster Theological Seminary and was still confused on how presuppositional apologetics works in actual practice. I must sat that after reading this book I still don't see how this approach is useful in defending the faith. I have respect for John Frame but this apologetical approach seems more like a non-approach. I'll be moving on to more fruitful endeavors such as actually learning specific defenses for the Christian faith.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 23, 2011