SKU: 73660344433
3 month old in uppababy vista

3 month old in uppababy vista UPPAbaby Vista V3 Stroller

Sale price$24.42 Regular price$27.13
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

3 month old in uppababy vista UPPAbaby Vista V3 Strollerby UPPAbaby Babesta Pick Best Modular Family Stroller for NYC Category: Full size strollers Modular expandable strollers Travel systems Certifications: GREENGUARD Gold JPMA Certified REACH certified leather Warranty: 3 year transferable The UPPAbaby Vista V3 is a 27. 6 lb premium modular stroller suitable from birth (with Bassinet or Infant SnugSeat) through 50 lbs, offering 30+ configurations including single, double, and triple setups. As NYC's

by UPPAbaby  |  Babesta Pick — Best Modular Family Stroller for NYC

Category: Full-size strollers  |  Modular/expandable strollers  |  Travel systems

Certifications: GREENGUARD® Gold  |  JPMA Certified  |  REACH-certified leather

Warranty: 3-year transferable

The UPPAbaby Vista V3 is a 27.6 lb premium modular stroller suitable from birth (with Bassinet or Infant SnugSeat) through 50 lbs, offering 30+ configurations including single, double, and triple setups. As NYC's expert baby boutique, we consider the Vista V3 the gold standard for growing families who need one stroller to do it all — from newborn on the subway to a second child in a double configuration in Central Park. Its enormous 30 lb basket, never-flat tires, FlexRide suspension, and magnetic harness buckle make it one of the most well-engineered full-size strollers on the market.

For first-time parents planning for more children, families already expecting baby number two, or anyone who wants a stroller that evolves with their family without starting over — the Vista V3 is Babesta's top recommendation for a long-haul family stroller.

 

Specifications

Stroller weight (frame + seat)

27.6 lbs (frame: 19.8 lbs | seat: 7.8 lbs)

Folded dimensions (with seat)

16.3" × 25.7" × 33.8"

Folded dimensions (without seat)

11.3" × 25.5" × 32.3"

Unfolded dimensions

36" L × 25.7" W × 39.5" H

Fold type

One-step; self-stands when folded; can fold with or without seat

Suitable from birth?

Yes — with Bassinet or Infant SnugSeat accessory

Suitable without accessories?

3 months to 50 lbs (toddler seat)

Max child weight (toddler seat)

50 lbs (approx. age 4–5)

Max child weight (RumbleSeat)

40 lbs

Basket weight capacity

30 lbs — one of the largest in class

Seating configurations

30+ configurations; single, double, or triple

Seat positions

Forward-facing, parent-facing, multi-position recline (one-hand)

Handlebar

Adjustable telescoping height; one-hand operation

Suspension

Enhanced FlexRide™ — frame-integrated, smooth on city pavement

Tires

Never-flat; front wheel locks with visual indicators; all-terrain wheels optional

Canopy

Extendable UPF 50+; zip-out mesh panels; water-repellent

Harness

Magnetic buckle; easy no-rethread adjustment

Seat liner

All-Weather Comfort Seat; seasonal liner + converts to mesh

Certifications

GREENGUARD® Gold; JPMA certified; REACH-certified leather

Warranty

3-year transferable

Included in box

Stroller, toddler seat, seasonal seat liner, bug shield, rain shield, storage bag

 

Best For / Not For

Best For: Growing families (planning for a 2nd or 3rd child), parents who want one stroller from birth through preschool, Central Park walkers, Hudson Park strollers, parents who carry heavy loads (30 lb basket is best in class), and families building a UPPAbaby travel system with the Mesa or Aria infant car seat.

Not For: Parents who need an ultra-compact travel stroller, frequent subway folding/unfolding as a solo commuter, or those in 4th-floor walkups without an elevator. At 27.6 lbs it is not a carry-up-stairs stroller.

Available Colors

Colors

Jake (black), Greyson, Callum (blue), Kenzi (green/blue), Savannah (white/grey), Owen (charcoal mélange), Ada (beige), Julian (aqua) — plus limited editions

Frame options

Carbon (matte)

 

Is it suitable for my baby's age?

Newborn (0–3 months)

Yes — with the separately sold Bassinet (lie-flat, GREENGUARD Gold certified) or Infant SnugSeat accessory.

Infant (3–12 months)

Yes — toddler seat reclined, UPPAbaby Mesa or Aria infant car seat clicks in with no adapter needed.

Toddler (1–4 years)

Yes — forward or parent-facing seat, adjustable footrest and recline, magnetic harness, up to 50 lbs.

Two children

Yes — add the RumbleSeat V3 (up to 40 lbs) below the main seat. Upper Adapters (sold separately) give more legroom between seats.

Three children

Yes — add the PiggyBack Ride-Along Board for an older sibling. Folds flat and stays attached for the full fold.

 

Is it good for NYC / city use?

Yes, with context. The Vista V3 is Babesta's pick for NYC families who are settled into a neighborhood and strolling daily — think Park Slope, the UWS, Tribeca, Astoria. The FlexRide suspension handles uneven sidewalks, the basket holds a full grocery run (30 lbs), and the adjustable handlebar accommodates parents of any height for those long weekend walks. The one-step fold self-stands, so it's easy to manage in a cab or elevator building lobby.

Important NYC note: This is not a subway-carry stroller. At 27.6 lbs with a wide folded footprint, it is best suited to parents with a car, garage, or a building with elevator access. For families who want a Vista V3 AND a subway-friendly option, Babesta often recommends pairing it with a lightweight like the Joolz Aer2 for transit days.

 

Quick Comparison

Wider and heavier than the Bugaboo Fox and UppaBaby Cruz, but offers significantly more basket capacity (30 lbs vs ~10–22 lbs) and unmatched modularity for growing families. Lighter than the Bugaboo Donkey6 in double configuration. The Vista V3 is the clear choice when you need to expand to a double without switching strollers.

 

Car Seat Compatibility

No adapter needed

UPPAbaby Mesa, UPPAbaby Aria

Adapter required (sold separately)

Clek, Cybex, Bugaboo x Nuna

 

What's Included

       UPPAbaby Vista V3 stroller frame

       All-Weather Comfort Toddler Seat with magnetic harness buckle

       Seasonal seat liner (for cooler months)

       Toddler seat bug shield

       Toddler seat rain shield

       Toddler seat storage bag

       3-year transferable warranty

 

Optional Add-Ons Available at Babesta

       UPPAbaby Vista V3 Bassinet — for newborn lie-flat use (strongly recommended for 0–3 months)

       Infant SnugSeat — for newborn seat use without the bassinet

       RumbleSeat V3 — second seat for a second child (up to 40 lbs)

       Upper Adapters — for added legroom between two seats in double configuration

       PiggyBack® Ride-Along Board — for a third child or older sibling

       UPPAbaby Mesa Infant Car Seat — clicks in without adapters

       UPPAbaby Aria Infant Car Seat — clicks in without adapters

       Car seat adapters for Clek, Cybex, Bugaboo x Nuna

       All-Terrain Wheels (optional upgrade) — for parks, gravel, beach boardwalks

       Cozy Ganoosh — footmuff/sleeping bag for cold NYC winters

 

Babesta Pick — Why We Carry It

There are a lot of full-size strollers on the market, but the Vista V3 earns its place as Babesta's top recommendation for growing families for a few reasons. First, the modularity is genuinely future-proof: if you have your first child and then get pregnant again, you don’t have to sell your stroller — you just add a RumbleSeat. Second, the basket is the best in class at 30 lbs; for NYC parents doing grocery runs, that matters every single day. Third, the magnetic harness buckle sounds like a small detail until you've wrestled a 2-year-old into a non-magnetic buckle in January. And fourth, the FlexRide suspension actually handles NYC sidewalks — we’ve tested it on Warren Street outside our store, and the ride quality over cracked pavement is noticeably smoother than competitors at the same price point.

The one honest trade-off: this is not a light stroller. If you live in a walkup, we’ll have a real conversation with you about whether this is your everyday stroller or one that lives in a car. That’s the kind of guidance you get at Babesta that you don’t get online.

 

Babesta Services on This Purchase

When you buy the Vista V3 from Babesta, you get:

       Free in-store assembly and full stroller demo — we walk you through every fold, harness, and recline position

       Home delivery below Canal Street NYC (assembled) and same-day courier delivery in NYC/Brooklyn (unassembled)

       Hold it until you’re ready — buy it now, take it when baby arrives, no rush

       Price match guarantee — found it cheaper? We'll match it

       Registry support — add to your Babesta registry with expert guidance on compatible accessories

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use this as my only stroller?

Yes for most NYC families in elevator buildings or with a car. If you live in a walkup, we’d recommend pairing it with a lightweight like the Joolz Aer2 for those days. The Vista V3 is a daily stroller, not a travel/carry stroller.

This being said, we find that most parents we work with need a stroller for the neighborhood, but also want another for quick trips around the city or adventures abroad. So you can use it as your one and only, but you may want to consider a lightweight for later just to make travels even easier.

Does the bassinet come included?

No — with the V3, the bassinet is sold separately. Babesta strongly recommends it for the newborn phase (0–3 months). The lie-flat position is optimal for newborns, and the UPPAbaby Bassinet is GREENGUARD Gold certified and overnight sleep ready.

Can it convert to a double stroller?

Yes — add the RumbleSeat V3 (sold separately) for a second child up to 40 lbs. The RumbleSeat attaches below the main seat. Adding the Upper Adapters (also sold separately) gives more legroom between the two children — we recommend it.

Which infant car seats are compatible without adapters?

The UPPAbaby Mesa and UPPAbaby Aria click directly onto the Vista V3 frame with no adapters needed. For Clek, Cybex, and Bugaboo x Nuna, adapters are required and sold separately. Ask our team at Babesta for the correct adapter for your car seat brand.

Also note, that when choosing your car seat, think about your whole stroller situation (one stroller or two) and find a car seat that can work with all of them. This way you have maximum choice when taking your trip.

Is it good for Central Park and outdoor walks?

Yes — the FlexRide suspension and never-flat tires handle grass, gravel, and park paths well. For more serious off-road use (beach, hiking trails), UPPAbaby sells optional All-Terrain Wheels separately.

Can I fold it with the second seat attached?

The stroller can fold with or without the main toddler seat attached. The PiggyBack Ride-Along Board also folds with the stroller attached. The RumbleSeat should be removed before folding.

Can I try it in person?

Yes — the UPPAbaby Vista V3 is on the floor at Babesta Tribeca, 56 Warren Street. Our team can walk you through the fold, the double configuration setup, the car seat click-in, and let you push it outside on the pavement.

Can I put this on my baby registry?

Yes — the Vista V3 is one of Babesta’s most-registered strollers. Setting up a Babesta registry comes with exclusive perks and services, including expert guidance on which accessories to add from day one versus which ones to wait on.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 73660344433

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell 3 month old in uppababy vista

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 1563 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
L
Verified Purchase
Lyndon Unger
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps. Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile. Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312). On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking. Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism. On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors. I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16). I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer. It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009
J
Verified Purchase
J. E. Lindsey
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Contrasts
Format: Paperback
Cowan tells us, "This is a book about apologetics methodology, not a book of apologetics per se. That is, it is not a book that seeks to do apologetics as much as a book that discusses how one ought to do apologetics" (8). Cowan has achieved the stated purposes of this book in many ways, but due to limited space I will stay focused on three examples; Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts, format, and conclusion by Cowan. Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts (21-24) in this initial section of the book provide a clear and useful starting place for persons who are not academically familiar or comfortable with many terms used in the book. The fact that the key terms section included and defined conceptual terms supports the stated purpose of the book being a methodological rather than an apologetic book with multiple views from various writers' specific understandings and preferred styles of apologetics. As a new person to formal apologetics, this section helped launch me smoothly into the methodological discussions. I returned to these pages a few times to reacquaint myself with meaningful concepts. The format of the discussion with proponents making a methodological case for their form of apologetic followed by critiques from supporters of other apologetic systems brought clarity to the five methods addressed in this book. This format help to highlight both strengths and weaknesses in methods. Cowan as the general editor achieved the goal of keeping the writers away from apologetics and on the goal of providing defense and critiques of these five methods. Each supporter had a unique "tee-up" to their sections. Craig starts by stating, "...methodology in Christian apologetics...raising the age-old issue of the relationship between faith and reason." He goes on further in his introduction to tell a story about his struggle at Wheaton College and why his methodology was helpful to his faith (26). Habermas clarifies that his form of evidential apologetics is, "...characterized as the one-step approach..." (92).This initial piece of information was insightful to me and a helpful clarification between classical and evidential methods. Feinberg on Cumulative Apologetics points out, "A good place to begin the discussion of apologetic methodology is to ask about the nature of the case for theism and Christianity" (148). Frame was probably the most direct in his initial statement by saying, "In apologetics, as in every aspect of the Christian life, the most important thing is to glorify God. Therefore, it is important for us to look in God's Word, the Bible, to see if our Lord gives us any directives relevant to the apologetic task" (208). In principle agree, but I will admit, I find his form of apologetics to be too circular in nature to be convincing to an unbelieving skeptic - as a standalone method. Christians I think would all say, well of course. Clark's section begins with stories meant to set the stage that it is reasonable have faith. Clark writes, "My suppose-this and suppose-that stories are intended to raise the problem of the relationship of our important beliefs to evidence" (267). Each of the five supporters of their method successfully introduced their unique method of apologetics. Cowan regarding to his conclusions says, "Hopefully, this will not only help you, the reader, make your own decisions regarding apologetic methodology, but will also provide a basis for further discussion of the topic among scholars. Cowan's conclusions assured that main points of agreement and disagreement were clear. Here as with the other sections, the textual comments were method focused. My criticism is pointed at the spirit of the debate. The writers did not draw enough contrasting between apologetic methods to clearly show that their individual method should be favored. I think the tone was a little too stilted in the direction of "playing" nice. In a book that purports to have five methods, there were times it seemed like only three or four methods. I guess this is inescapable give that each apologetic style can share some parts in common with another. Yet Craig shares my feeling here, I believe, based on his statement, "Pity our poor editor! Ideally he would like to find a wild-eyed fideist on one end of the spectrum and a hard-nosed theological rationalist on the other. Instead he winds up with a presuppositionalist who argues like an evidentialist..." (122). Overall Five Views on Apologetics provides a good compare and contrast resource for anyone interested in these five common methods of apologetics.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2011
M
Verified Purchase
Mimi
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Condense Analysis of 5 of the most notable Apologist
Format: Paperback
Looking for a quick reference guide to the major theorist of Apologic study, this book is a great resource.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2024
W
Verified Purchase
Will L.
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Not an Intro to Apologetics
Format: Paperback
This book is not for the first-time student of apologetics. It's deep and, at times, difficult. However, for anyone with a serious interest in apologetics, this is a great way to find out which method suits your apologetic style and why. It was eye-opening for me. I am confident that God can use most (if not all) of the five distinct methods covered in the book. But it was very helpful to me to consider pros and cons of each and decide which approach seemed appropriate for me. Great book, if you feel ready for it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2006
R
Verified Purchase
rkveale
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 4
Good overview of apologetic methods but ....
Format: Paperback
I very much enjoy the counterpoint series by Zondervan. It can help me quickly come up to speed in a variety of theological topics. This book has 5 contributors and each one presents, each one comments on each other's essay and finally each one has some concluding remarks which allows the reader to readily judge the competing opinions. However after reading the various approaches it appears to me that the apologetical approach one uses is not as important as learning the various theistic arguments (both positive and negative) and then putting them into practice. I'm not convinced that studying apologetic methods will be that helpful. This is because the various approaches overlap and also because when actually talking with people one must be very flexible and move deftly with the flow of conversation. Yet still I give this book 4 stars as there are 5 top Christian thinkers contributing to this subject. On a personal note, one reason I read this book is because I was puzzled by presuppositional apologetics. I stand firmly in the reformed camp and I audited iTunesU courses in apologetics from Reformed Theological Seminary and Westminster Theological Seminary and was still confused on how presuppositional apologetics works in actual practice. I must sat that after reading this book I still don't see how this approach is useful in defending the faith. I have respect for John Frame but this apologetical approach seems more like a non-approach. I'll be moving on to more fruitful endeavors such as actually learning specific defenses for the Christian faith.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 23, 2011

recommand products