SKU: 49193529114
monstera shop

monstera shop 6-8ft Monstera Deliciosa- NYC, NJ, CT, Boston, Providence, Washington DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Princeton, Long Island, and Upstate NY Local Plant

Sale price$22.46 Regular price$24.96
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

monstera shop 6-8ft Monstera Deliciosa- NYC, NJ, CT, Boston, Providence, Washington DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Princeton, Long Island, and Upstate NY Local PlantDescription The Monstera Deliciosa has been capturing hearts for generations, and we completely understand why. This gentle giant brings such warmth and character to any space with those iconic split leaves that develop naturally as the plant matures. Originally from the rainforests of southern Mexico and Central America, she's perfectly adapted for indoor life and genuinely wants to thrive in your home. What makes her truly special are those

Description

The Monstera Deliciosa has been capturing hearts for generations, and we completely understand why. This gentle giant brings such warmth and character to any space with those iconic split leaves that develop naturally as the plant matures. 

Originally from the rainforests of southern Mexico and Central America, she's perfectly adapted for indoor life and genuinely wants to thrive in your home. What makes her truly special are those beautiful fenestrations (the fancy term for the natural holes in her leaves) that aren't just stunning to look at—they actually help her survive in windy conditions by allowing air to flow through. In nature, she's a climber who uses aerial roots to scale trees while drawing nutrients from the humid air around her. While many Monstera varieties exist, this classic Monstera Deliciosa remains the most beloved for good reason.



Care 

How do you care for an indoor Monstera deliciosa?

Caring for an indoor Monstera Deliciosa means providing bright indirect light near windows, weekly watering when the topsoil feels dry, and maintaining comfortable temperatures between sixty-five to eighty-five degrees Fahrenheit throughout the year for optimal healthy growth.

The beauty of Monstera plant care is that once you understand her basic needs, she's wonderfully forgiving. Place her where she can enjoy filtered sunlight—think of the dappled light filtering through a rainforest canopy. Water when the top 2-3 inches of soil feel dry to your touch, and she'll show her appreciation with new growth. A well-draining potting mix with some perlite keeps her roots comfortable, and during the growing season, a monthly feeding with balanced Monstera fertilizer helps support those magnificent leaves.


Should I mist my Monstera deliciosa?

Misting your Monstera Deliciosa helps increase humidity levels around her gorgeous leaves, which she truly appreciates since she naturally thrives in humid rainforest conditions where moisture levels stay consistently high throughout the growing seasons for healthy development.

It’s not absolutely necessary, but gentle misting makes her feel more at home, especially during dry winter months when indoor heating can reduce air moisture. Think of it as a little spa treatment for your plant friend. You can also place a humidity tray nearby or use a humidifier if you want to create that perfect environment.


How often should I water a Monstera deliciosa inside?

Water your Monstera Deliciosa inside every one to two weeks during growing season, carefully checking that the top two to three inches of soil feel completely dry before giving her another thorough drink to promote healthy growth.

The key to successful watering is paying attention to what your plant is telling you rather than following a strict schedule. In brighter locations, she'll be thirstier and may need weekly watering, while in lower light she can comfortably wait longer between drinks. We always recommend the finger test—stick your finger right into the soil to check moisture levels. This personal approach works much better than calendar-based watering and helps you build that wonderful connection with your plant.


What does a Monstera need to thrive?

A Monstera needs bright indirect light from windows, well-draining nutrient-rich soil mixtures, moderate to high humidity levels, consistent moisture without sogginess, adequate room to grow and climb upward, plus warm stable temperatures year-round for optimal health and development.

Creating the right environment is about understanding her natural habitat and bringing those conditions indoors in a gentle way. She loves having space to spread those magnificent leaves and really appreciates a moss pole or trellis to support her climbing nature.


What do Monstera deliciosa like to be potted in?

Monstera Deliciosa like being potted in well-draining organic-rich soil blends with excellent drainage capabilities, typically combining high-quality potting soil with perlite and orchid bark chunks for optimal aeration and proper drainage throughout the root system for healthy plant development.

The perfect soil mix holds just enough moisture without becoming soggy—imagine the texture of a well-made chocolate cake that's moist but not wet. Adding perlite or bark chips creates those important air pockets that keep her roots breathing comfortably. Always choose a pot with drainage holes because good drainage is one of the most loving things you can provide for your plant.


Where is the best place to put a Monstera plant?

The best place to put a Monstera plant is near large windows that provide bright indirect light throughout the day, such as living rooms, bedrooms, or home offices with east or west-facing window exposure for optimal growing conditions.

Bathrooms and kitchens with natural light are also wonderful spots because of their naturally higher humidity levels, which makes her feel right at home. Avoid placing her directly in harsh afternoon sun from south-facing windows—think gentle morning light or filtered afternoon glow instead. 


Should I put my Monstera in the window?

You should place your Monstera near a window with bright filtered light rather than directly in harsh afternoon sun exposure, which can easily scorch her delicate leaves and cause permanent brown damage throughout the foliage that ruins her natural beauty.


East or west-facing windows are perfect because she can enjoy gentle morning sun without dealing with those intense afternoon rays that are too much for her rainforest sensibilities. If you only have a south-facing window, position her a few feet back or use a sheer curtain to create that perfect filtered light she craves.


Is Monstera deliciosa a good indoor plant?

Monstera deliciosa is an excellent indoor plant choice because it adapts remarkably well to home environments, tolerates various indoor conditions gracefully, purifies air effectively, and creates absolutely stunning visual impact in any space while requiring minimal daily care.

She's genuinely designed for sharing our homes—forgiving when life gets busy, adaptable to different light situations, and grows at a thoughtful pace that won't overwhelm your space. Plus, those beautiful large leaves work hard to clean your air while creating that lush, peaceful atmosphere we all crave. For plant parents who want a meaningful relationship with a plant that gives back as much as it receives, she's truly special.



Pet-friendly?

The Monstera deliciosa is not pet-friendly, as all parts contain calcium oxalate crystals that are harmful to cats, dogs, and other pets if eaten. We always recommend keeping this beautiful plant safely out of reach of curious furry family members who might be tempted to explore with their mouths.


Is Monstera deliciosa toxic to dogs?

Monstera deliciosa is toxic to dogs because calcium oxalate crystals throughout the plant cause oral irritation, excessive drooling, vomiting, and difficulty swallowing if any of the parts are ingested, meaning you’ll need immediate veterinary attention for safety.


Is Monstera deliciosa toxic to cats?

Monstera Deliciosa is toxic to cats. It contains calcium oxalate crystals that can cause immediate mouth irritation, excessive drooling, vomiting, and potentially even more severe symptoms if large amounts of it are consumed by your curious felines.


Factoids

Is Monstera deliciosa toxic to touch?

Monstera deliciosa sap can cause mild skin irritation or rashes in sensitive individuals due to calcium oxalate crystals in plant tissues, but it's generally safe to touch during normal handling and care. Always wash your hands after pruning or repotting.


Is it safe to have a Monstera in your bedroom?

Having a Monstera in your bedroom is completely safe for most people, provided pets and children can’t get access the plant. It also offers excellent air-purifying benefits, giving you better sleep quality while creating a beautiful ambience.

She actually makes a wonderful bedroom companion—those magnificent leaves work quietly through the night to filter toxins from your air while you rest. Just ensure she gets adequate light near a window and that curious pets or little ones can't reach her. Many of our customers find having plants in their sleep space creates a calming, nurturing environment that helps them unwind at the end of each day.


Are Monstera deliciosa air purifiers?

Monstera deliciosa is an effective air purifier that helps filter harmful toxins and improve indoor air quality. They’re popular choices for homes and offices where you need natural air purification solutions that also provide stunning visual appeal.

Those impressive leaves aren't just for show—they're working steadily to clean your air throughout the day and night. She's particularly good at removing formaldehyde and other common indoor pollutants that can accumulate in our homes. While she won't replace a mechanical air purifier, she definitely contributes to a healthier indoor environment while looking absolutely beautiful doing it. It's like having a living air filter that also brings joy to your daily routine.


What is the origin of the name Monstera deliciosa?

The name Monstera deliciosa is made up of the Latin words meaning "monstrous", referring to the dramatic split leaves with striking fenestrations, and "delicious", specifically referencing the plant's edible fruit when it reaches full ripeness in natural habitats.

It's a name that perfectly captures both her dramatic visual impact and her hidden culinary talents.


Is Monstera deliciosa known by any other names?

The Monstera deliciosa is known by many names, including Swiss cheese plant, split-leaf philodendron, fruit salad plant, delicious monster, ceriman, windowleaf, Mexican breadfruit, and Penglai banana, with names varying by different geographic regions and plant communities worldwide.

The "Swiss cheese plant" nickname is probably the most popular because of those distinctive holes that look like nature's own artwork. "Split-leaf philodendron" stuck even though she's not technically a philodendron—sometimes plant names take on a life of their own! 


Why does Monstera deliciosa have holes in its leaves?

Those distinctive holes are brilliant evolutionary adaptations that prevent wind damage by allowing air to flow through the leaves in her native rainforest environment, while also helping rainwater reach the forest floor to support the entire ecosystem around her.


Can you eat Monstera deliciosa fruit?

You can eat Monstera Deliciosa fruit only when it reaches full ripeness, as it tastes like a delightful blend of pineapple and banana, but unripe fruit contains irritating calcium oxalate crystals that cause mouth discomfort and should be avoided completely.


Buy a Monstera deliciosa

Your home is ready for this beloved classic that has been bringing joy to plant families for generations. This Monstera deliciosa offers you the chance to nurture a living piece of art that grows more beautiful with time, developing those iconic split leaves that make every space feel more alive and welcoming.

Through our live video shopping calls, you can meet your exact plant before she arrives—we believe in making sure you feel completely confident about welcoming her into your home. Point to the one that speaks to your heart, and we'll ensure that special plant arrives looking just as healthy and beautiful as when you first fell in love. Because choosing the right plant is the beginning of a wonderful, long-term relationship.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 49193529114

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell monstera shop

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 675 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
L
Verified Purchase
Lyndon Unger
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps. Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile. Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312). On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking. Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism. On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors. I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16). I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer. It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009
J
Verified Purchase
J. E. Lindsey
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Contrasts
Format: Paperback
Cowan tells us, "This is a book about apologetics methodology, not a book of apologetics per se. That is, it is not a book that seeks to do apologetics as much as a book that discusses how one ought to do apologetics" (8). Cowan has achieved the stated purposes of this book in many ways, but due to limited space I will stay focused on three examples; Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts, format, and conclusion by Cowan. Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts (21-24) in this initial section of the book provide a clear and useful starting place for persons who are not academically familiar or comfortable with many terms used in the book. The fact that the key terms section included and defined conceptual terms supports the stated purpose of the book being a methodological rather than an apologetic book with multiple views from various writers' specific understandings and preferred styles of apologetics. As a new person to formal apologetics, this section helped launch me smoothly into the methodological discussions. I returned to these pages a few times to reacquaint myself with meaningful concepts. The format of the discussion with proponents making a methodological case for their form of apologetic followed by critiques from supporters of other apologetic systems brought clarity to the five methods addressed in this book. This format help to highlight both strengths and weaknesses in methods. Cowan as the general editor achieved the goal of keeping the writers away from apologetics and on the goal of providing defense and critiques of these five methods. Each supporter had a unique "tee-up" to their sections. Craig starts by stating, "...methodology in Christian apologetics...raising the age-old issue of the relationship between faith and reason." He goes on further in his introduction to tell a story about his struggle at Wheaton College and why his methodology was helpful to his faith (26). Habermas clarifies that his form of evidential apologetics is, "...characterized as the one-step approach..." (92).This initial piece of information was insightful to me and a helpful clarification between classical and evidential methods. Feinberg on Cumulative Apologetics points out, "A good place to begin the discussion of apologetic methodology is to ask about the nature of the case for theism and Christianity" (148). Frame was probably the most direct in his initial statement by saying, "In apologetics, as in every aspect of the Christian life, the most important thing is to glorify God. Therefore, it is important for us to look in God's Word, the Bible, to see if our Lord gives us any directives relevant to the apologetic task" (208). In principle agree, but I will admit, I find his form of apologetics to be too circular in nature to be convincing to an unbelieving skeptic - as a standalone method. Christians I think would all say, well of course. Clark's section begins with stories meant to set the stage that it is reasonable have faith. Clark writes, "My suppose-this and suppose-that stories are intended to raise the problem of the relationship of our important beliefs to evidence" (267). Each of the five supporters of their method successfully introduced their unique method of apologetics. Cowan regarding to his conclusions says, "Hopefully, this will not only help you, the reader, make your own decisions regarding apologetic methodology, but will also provide a basis for further discussion of the topic among scholars. Cowan's conclusions assured that main points of agreement and disagreement were clear. Here as with the other sections, the textual comments were method focused. My criticism is pointed at the spirit of the debate. The writers did not draw enough contrasting between apologetic methods to clearly show that their individual method should be favored. I think the tone was a little too stilted in the direction of "playing" nice. In a book that purports to have five methods, there were times it seemed like only three or four methods. I guess this is inescapable give that each apologetic style can share some parts in common with another. Yet Craig shares my feeling here, I believe, based on his statement, "Pity our poor editor! Ideally he would like to find a wild-eyed fideist on one end of the spectrum and a hard-nosed theological rationalist on the other. Instead he winds up with a presuppositionalist who argues like an evidentialist..." (122). Overall Five Views on Apologetics provides a good compare and contrast resource for anyone interested in these five common methods of apologetics.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2011
M
Verified Purchase
Mimi
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Condense Analysis of 5 of the most notable Apologist
Format: Paperback
Looking for a quick reference guide to the major theorist of Apologic study, this book is a great resource.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2024
W
Verified Purchase
Will L.
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Not an Intro to Apologetics
Format: Paperback
This book is not for the first-time student of apologetics. It's deep and, at times, difficult. However, for anyone with a serious interest in apologetics, this is a great way to find out which method suits your apologetic style and why. It was eye-opening for me. I am confident that God can use most (if not all) of the five distinct methods covered in the book. But it was very helpful to me to consider pros and cons of each and decide which approach seemed appropriate for me. Great book, if you feel ready for it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2006
R
Verified Purchase
rkveale
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 4
Good overview of apologetic methods but ....
Format: Paperback
I very much enjoy the counterpoint series by Zondervan. It can help me quickly come up to speed in a variety of theological topics. This book has 5 contributors and each one presents, each one comments on each other's essay and finally each one has some concluding remarks which allows the reader to readily judge the competing opinions. However after reading the various approaches it appears to me that the apologetical approach one uses is not as important as learning the various theistic arguments (both positive and negative) and then putting them into practice. I'm not convinced that studying apologetic methods will be that helpful. This is because the various approaches overlap and also because when actually talking with people one must be very flexible and move deftly with the flow of conversation. Yet still I give this book 4 stars as there are 5 top Christian thinkers contributing to this subject. On a personal note, one reason I read this book is because I was puzzled by presuppositional apologetics. I stand firmly in the reformed camp and I audited iTunesU courses in apologetics from Reformed Theological Seminary and Westminster Theological Seminary and was still confused on how presuppositional apologetics works in actual practice. I must sat that after reading this book I still don't see how this approach is useful in defending the faith. I have respect for John Frame but this apologetical approach seems more like a non-approach. I'll be moving on to more fruitful endeavors such as actually learning specific defenses for the Christian faith.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 23, 2011

recommand products